8/13/2023 0 Comments Type 2 odontoid fracture icd 10These rare injuries require only external immobilization with an orthosis if there is no associated … webstratomail appsiut Icd 10 code for closed nondisplaced odontoid fracture with type ii morphology WebICD-10 code S12.112 for Nondisplaced Type II dens fracture is a medical classification as listed by WHO under the range - Injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of … webstrat return codes Webden 1. ![]() ICD List ICD-10-CM Code for Posterior displaced Type II dens fracture … WebType I fractures are avulsion fractures of the tip of the odontoid process. ![]() 2023 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code S12.112D: Nondisplaced Type … 2012 ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Code 805.02 : Closed fracture of … Icd 10 code for closed nondisplaced odontoid fracture with type ii morphology american tours kingsport tn S12.112G - Nondisplaced Type II dens fracture, subsequent. Important prognostic factors for fracture healing (union versus non-union) are the. It can be caused by either hyper-flexion or hyperextension mechanisms of injury. This case demonstrates a type 2 odontoid process fracture, a transverse fracture through the base of the dens and represents the most common type of dens fracture. Poor outcome is associated with spinal cord injury, GCS score, AIS score, and ISS.ĪIS = Abbreviated Injury Scale GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale ISS = Injury Severity Score SCI = spinal cord injury Type II odontoid fracture cervical elderly populations nonoperative management spine trauma.Icd 10 code for closed nondisplaced odontoid fracture with type ii morphology 2023 ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code S12.14XS: Type III traumatic. CONCLUSIONS Type II odontoid fracture is associated with high morbidity among octogenarians, with 41% 1-year mortality independent of intervention-a dramatic decrease from actuarial survival rates for all 80-, 90-, and 100-year-old Americans. The rate of nonhome disposition was not significant between the groups. Additional cervical fracture was not associated with increased mortality. Spinal cord injury, GCS score, AIS score, and ISS were significantly associated with 30-day and 1-year mortality however, Cox modeling was not significant for any variable. Kaplan-Meier analysis did not demonstrate a survival advantage for either management strategy. Nonoperative and operative mortality rates were not significant at any time point (12% vs 18%, p = 0.5 27% vs 24%, p = 0.8 and 41% vs 41%, p = 1.0 ). Overall mortality was 13% in-hospital, 26% at 30 days, and 41% at 1 year. The mean time to death or last follow-up was 22 months (range 0-129 months) and was nonsignificant between operative and nonoperative groups (p = 0.3). Additional cervical fracture, spinal cord injury, GCS score, AIS score, and ISS were not associated with either management strategy at the time of presentation. The mean age was 87 years (range 80-104 years). Mortality data were available for 100% of patients. RESULTS A total of 111 patients met inclusion criteria (94 nonoperative and 17 operative ). Statistical tests included the Student t-test, chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier test, and Cox proportional hazard. Primary end points were mortality at 30 days and at 1 year. ![]() Prospectively recorded outcomes included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, Injury Severity Score (ISS), additional cervical fracture, and cord injury. Cervical CT images were independently reviewed by blinded neurosurgeons to confirm a Type II fracture pattern. METHODS A single-center prospectively maintained trauma database was reviewed using ICD-9 codes to identify octogenarians with C-2 cervical fractures between 19. The authors compared operative and nonoperative management in patients older than 79 years. Previous studies have demonstrated a survival advantage following early surgery among patients older than 65 years, yet octogenarians represent a medically distinct and rapidly growing population. OBJECTIVE Type II odontoid fracture is a common injury among elderly patients, particularly given their predisposition toward low-energy falls.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |